Assignment Rubric – Essay Furious


Graduate General Writing Assignment Rubric

Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators
Exceptional Good Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Unacceptable
Content: assignment
requirements addressed;
demonstrates
understanding of material
appropriate to grade level;
writer’s position and
intent are clear;
30% of total points
Quality work that exceeds
expectations in terms of
quality and accuracy with
no errors.
(30)
Work exceeds all of the
criterion requirements
with minimal errors
(27)
Work meets the criterion,
includes analysis, synthesis
and/or evaluation of
relevant information and
concepts, contains errors
that do not impair reader’s
understanding
(24)
Work reflects an attempt
to meet the criterion but
does not minimally meet
the criterion and/or work
does not include analysis,
synthesis and/or
evaluation of relevant
information and concepts
(21)
Multiple criterion are
missing; contains sufficient
errors to make meaning
difficult to follow
(18)
Research: incorporates
scholarly research that
strengthens and supports
writer’s position
20%
Exceeds research
expectations with minimal
direct quotes and
no
errors
(20)
Exceeds research
expectations with minimal
direct quotes and minimal
errors
(18)
Meets stated research
expectations, includes
acceptable number of
direct quotes
(16)
Fails to meet research
expectation and/or relies
heavily on direct quotes
rather than paraphrasing
(14)
Includes minimal research;
research demonstrated
only through direct
quotes/no paraphrasing
(12)
Critical thinking:
arguments are logical;
position is well defended;
paper flows logically
20%
A level of critical thinking
that exceeds expectations;
strong/convincing logic
with
no errors
(20)
Strong critical thinking
skills; strong/convincing
logic with minimal errors
(18)
Demonstrates an
acceptable level of critical
thinking for grade level;
flow is logical, but position
only minimally defended
(16)
Demonstrates some
critical thinking; logic is
not consistently clear;
position not defended
(14)
Minimal critical thinking;
logic is convoluted or
absent
(12)
Structure: contains a
proper introduction and
conclusion; utilizes proper
paragraph format and
academic voice; reads as a
polished, academic paper
10%
Quality exceeds
expectations including
intro and conclusion with
no errors
(10)
Quality of paper structure
exceeds expectations with
minimal errors
(9)
Structure meets
expectations with minimal
errors
(8)
Structure does not meet
graduate level
expectations. May be
missing intro or
conclusion, or contains
errors in voice, paragraph
format, etc.
(7)
Does neither an intro or
conclusion and lacks
proper paragraph
structure, academic voice,
etc.
(6)
Mechanical:clean
writing  mechanics,  with  no
spelling,  grammatical  or
punctuation  errors  10%
NO  writing  errors
(10)
Minimal  (<5)  writing
errorsthat  do  not
distract  reader
(9)
Some  writing  errors,  but
non  that  impact  the
reader’s  ability  to
understand  message
(8)
Significant  number  of
writing  errors  that
reduce
readability/profession
alism  of  work
(7)
Writing  errors  make
work  difficult  to
read/reduce
comprehension
(6)
APA: paper is in proper
format and cited properly
according to the APA
Publication Manual (6th
Ed.)
10%
NO citation or formatting
errors
(10)
Minimal (1-­‐2) errors
related to APA format or
citation
(9)
Some errors in APA paper
format or citation
(8)
Significant number of
errors in APAformat or
citation
(7)
Demonstrates lack of
understanding of APA
(6)
out of 100%

 

WE’VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT