Do Classical Realists Show That There is no Place for Morality in International Politics?


Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. The Athenians envoys, therefore, present one choice to Melians, either to surrender or face destruction, however, the Melians on the same note were asked not to bother appealing for justice but critically consider their survival. From the envoys’ massage, it is now clear that critical decisions about justice are not made anywhere but with human discussions only if both parties involved are under the same consumption but if one side is above the other, then the weak one has no choice but to accept. Parties being “under equal consumption” demonstrate that they are under good force of the law that automatically subjects them to a stable lawgiving authority of which by this time any authority above states was not in existence (Donnelly, 2000). The Athenians argue that the society at the time was in a lawless situation of international anarchy, by understanding, the only right that remains was the right championed by the stronger who can dominate the weak. Their viewpoint is to equate the right to mighty as they exclude any considerations related to justice

Human nature gives the platform for classical political realism. To the face of realists, they classify human beings to be inherent egoistic by nature since they are interested in how to pursue self-interest which clouds their moral principles. Classical realists in today’s neorealist, assume that the absence of government literally means total anarchy, which is the key determinate for the outcome of international politics (Lebow, 2003).

 

WE’VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT