DPI 815 Project Revision of the Submission on Topic 2 – Essay Furious


DPI 815 Project Revision of the Submission on Topic 2

Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to utilize the feedback you received on your DPI Project Milestone: Outline of 10 Strategic Points assignment you submitted in Topic 2. Ensure that you have incorporated all suggested changes and revisions from your instructor. Keep in mind your project will continue to evolve as you advance through the program. This is expected. It is essential that you continue to refine your 10 Strategic Points in subsequent courses.
General Requirements:
• Access the DC Network and download “10 Strategic Points.” ( I WILL DOWNLOAD AND SEND THIS)
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Directions:
Complete the “10 Strategic Points” document. Include all suggested changes and revisions from your instructor.
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A
I, (Vera U), verify that I have completed and logged (5) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

Rubric

DPI Project Milestone: Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision – Rubric
Criteria Description
Topic
4. Meets Expectations
0.5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
0.44 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
0.37 points
NA
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Lists primary points for four sections in the Literature Review: (a) Background of the problem/gap and the need for the project based on citations from the literature; (b) Theoretical foundations (models and theories to be foundation for study); (c) Review of literature topics with key concept for each one; (d) Summary.
4. Meets Expectations
7.5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
6.53 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
5.55 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Minimum of one or two original research articles from United States within 5 years of graduate date.
4. Meets Expectations
2 points
There are original research articles present to support the evidence-based intervention. The articles are from the United States and are within 5 years of graduation date.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
1.74 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
1.48 points
Revision is attempted, but is is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Describes the problem to address through the project based on defined gaps or needs from the literature.
4. Meets Expectations
2.5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
2.18 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
1.85 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Identifies sample, needed sample size, and location.
4. Meets Expectations
5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
4.35 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
3.7 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Provides clinical/PICOT questions to all of the collected data needed to address the problem statement.
4. Meets Expectations
5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
4.35 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
3.7 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DPI 815 Project Revision of the Submission on Topic 2

DPI 815 Project Revision of the Submission on Topic 2

DPI 815 Project Revision of the Submission on Topic 2

1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Provides variables for each project PICOT question component.
4. Meets Expectations
2.5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
2.18 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
1.85 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Describes the selected methodology and specific research design to address problem statement and clinical/PICOT questions.
4. Meets Expectations
5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
4.35 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
3.7 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Provides one-sentence statement of purpose including the problem statement, methodology, design, population sample, and location.
4. Meets Expectations
5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. The intervention is listed appropriately. There is a measurable patient outcome.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
4.35 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
3.7 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Describes primary instruments and sources of data to answer research questions. Reliability and validity of the instruments are addressed.
4. Meets Expectations
5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
4.35 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
3.7 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Describes the specific data analysis approaches to be used to address clinical/PICOT questions. The statistical test(s) that will be used must be identified and must be appropriate for the level of data and the clinical/PICOT question.
4. Meets Expectations
5 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
4.35 points
NA
2. Does not meet Expectations
3.7 points
Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.
1. Not present
0 points
Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.
Criteria Description
Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
4. Meets Expectations
2.5 points
All format elements are correct.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
2.18 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Does not meet Expectations
1.85 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Not present
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Criteria Description
Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
4. Meets Expectations
2.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
3. Approaching Meeting Expectations
2.18 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Does not meet Expectations
1.85 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Not present
0 points
Sources are not documented.

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
SAVE15

WE’VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT